Inflation: Understanding and Its Effects on the Forex Market

Inflation is an economic term that refers to a rise in the general price level of goods and services in a given economy over a specific period of time. Inflation is a normal phenomenon in active economies, but it can have a significant impact on financial markets, including the Forex market.

How does inflation happen? An increase in the price level in the market occurs when the demand for goods and services increases greater than the capacity to produce them. This can result from several factors, including increased consumer spending, improving economic conditions, and increased money circulating in the market.

The effect of inflation on currencies:

  1. Reduce purchasing power: Once inflation occurs, money loses its purchasing power. This means that with the same amount of money, it cannot buy the same amount of goods and services that it could previously.
  2. Effect on interest: Inflation may lead to an increase in interest rates. The central bank raises interest rates to control inflation and encourage debt relief. This effect can affect the value of the currency.

Impact of inflation on the Forex market:

  1. Currency Volatility: The effects of inflation can lead to volatility in the Forex markets. Investors may rely on price movements to adjust their strategies to avoid risk or take advantage of volatility.
  2. Trading strategies: Some traders may benefit from inflation through various strategies, such as trading based on expectations that local currencies will rise in light of inflation. Understanding the effects of inflation on the Forex market is crucial for traders. Investors should follow inflation reports and estimate their impact on markets to make informed investment decisions.

The revolution witnessed by central banks.

This required significant institutional reforms to achieve independence for central banks and the ability of a number of central banks to weather political headwinds and win de facto independence. Various reforms were made that allowed central banks to appoint economists and others whose studies focused on the causes of the great inflation that occurred in the 1970s and ways to reduce inflation, which could have a role in this revolution witnessed by central banks.

Only a small number of countries that were able to curb inflation later witnessed a chronic, uncontrolled inflationary boom. This means that only a small number of countries fell back into the clutches of inflation after recovering from the inflationary wave (or after a continuous period of recovery that extended until the beginning of the 1990s). This was also supported by a number of institutional reforms that provided central banks with the necessary strength to confront pressure from politicians to drive growth by increasing inflation at the appropriate moments.

The term “reining inflation” means keeping the quarterly inflation level below 4% for three years starting in 1990. The first time the central bank can reach this level is what we call the “blue chip month.” Just as members of Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step groups receive chips to indicate the length of recovery, the term “Blue Chip Month” marks three years since central banks recovered from inflation.

The scope of our study does not cover emerging markets or low-income countries because only a few of them have won the Blue Chip. Turkey is the only country so far in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development that has failed to reach this level. By the term “uncontrollable inflationary surge,” we mean an inflation level exceeding 4% for 36 months.

Analyzing Current Factors’ Impact on Future Inflation & Monetary Policies

The duration of the current inflationary bout will depend on two factors: first, the interaction between continued tight conditions in labor markets, supply chain bottlenecks, and the response of central banks, and second, the duration of the war in Ukraine and its repercussions on energy and food prices and global growth. According to previous historical experiences, this out-of-control inflationary boom will not last for more than two years. (However, some countries will likely lose their blue chip, mainly due to the inflation they have already experienced during the pandemic.) But this assessment may be wrong in a few places.

First, the anti-inflationary stance of central banks may give way in the face of the lasting repercussions of the pandemic, uncertainty about the path of recovery, and the temptations of raising inflation to reduce debt burdens globally. Claims not to prematurely derail the recovery process are based on the decline in labor force participation compared to pre-pandemic levels. The question now is whether the response function changed after the pandemic. While central banks in advanced economies may continue their anti-inflation stance, their stated plans – based on the dot plots (or similar charts) they currently produce – may not fit the requirements for lowering inflation. Calculations made using the traditional Taylor rule indicate that reducing inflation in a number of countries could require interest rate increases of up to 7%.

Raising interest rates to combat inflation is only a tool if its source is public financial policy. She likens lax fiscal policy and raising interest rates to control inflation to a driver pressing the accelerator and the brake at the same time. The study indicates that if doubts begin to creep into citizens regarding the extent of the government’s commitment to repaying its debts without discounting them by raising inflation rates

The Impact of Central Bank Policies on Inflation in GCC Countries

For GCC countries in general, central banks that win the blue chip rarely see chronic out-of-control inflation again – unless they are facing a massive financial crisis (like Iceland and the Baltics during the global financial crisis). We see this clearly in Chart 2, which displays the worst inflationary wave that lasted for three years in each of the OPEC member countries after winning the blue chip.

One of the signs that indicate a strong stance against inflation is what we see in central banks, whose employees rarely call for raising the inflation target. More generally, unless there is a major crisis, we see inflation only getting out of control if central banks are forced to abandon their anti-inflationary stance.

As a result of the zero lower bound policy, the actual response of central banks varied widely between above and below the 2% target rate. Inflation falling below 2% is acceptable to central banks, but exceeding this level makes them act as if this would impose a significant cost on welfare levels. Given these varying biases, inflationary expectations have declined gradually over time (even below the 2% level in some countries) until they have become a relatively ingrained feature of the inflation path, and these expectations have become difficult to shake if inflation rises in the short term.

Related Articles